As a independent writer I have to do a lot of what publishers used to do. Years ago a writer got to just do the writing. Editing, marketing and things like book covers and even book trailers was done by your publisher. People who have read my posts in other places know that the two small press publishers I have did none of that for me.
The editing and marketing parts bothered me quite a bit as I can only do so much editing on my own and well marketing is a skill, a well paid one. I have little to no idea how to market my work and I am very glad to those who have taken the plug to read my work.
Even more I have a huge thanks for those who have beta read some of my work and have pointed out where I need to fix something. When you are a starting writer with no money you have to hope to have wonderful friends who can help you.
But one thing I have enjoyed is making covers for my work. Many of the covers have come out of my photography hobby. When you have a few thousand nature shots it is easy to find something that will work. I keep searching the web for fun fonts and play around in photoshop to make them better. While most of my covers don't have half naked images I think they are okay.
Now that I have started trying to do painting I thought I would try doing one of my short story covers as a painting. I wrote a short called The Pest House, which is a Death Walks Through short story. It is based out of a story I read on the Nashua, NH facebook group. Pest houses were the places that people with contagious diseases were taken to back in the 1830s. Most of them were places for them to go and die. So it fit perfectly in my series.
Going through my little paintings (yes I do small paintings) I decided this painting just might work well for the cover for this tale of a ghost
So should I use this or not? Any suggestions?